Import substitution industrialization or export-led growth strategy for developing countries? | Experts’ Opinions

An export-led growth (ELG) or import substitution industrialization (ISI)? These are two of the main strategies that developing countries can implement within their economic advancement policies. While the first approach focuses on opening an economy to international trade, the second aims to make an economy self-sufficient by boosting industrialization. The trade strategies adopted by developing countries vary and often change over time as a result of impactful events which leads to different outcomes in trade and industrial performance. This raises the question: should developing countries focus on import substitution industrialization, pursue an export-led growth strategy, or combine both approaches? Relevant experts consider this in the article that follows.

DevelopmentAid: Should developing countries pursue import substitution industrialization or export-led growth economy or aim at combining both? What are the pros and cons?

“Governments in emerging economies and the Global South face a crucial decision when choosing between import substitution industrialization and export-led growth policies for economic development. While both approaches offer distinct advantages and challenges, the most effective path may lie in a hybrid strategy that combines elements from both. Import substitution industrialization (ISI) focuses on reducing reliance on imported goods by promoting the development of domestic industries. This approach can stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and foster the development of local industries. ISI also helps to shield the economy from external shocks and reduces trade deficits. However, this strategy can lead to inefficiencies, as domestic industries may lack the competitiveness and innovation needed to thrive without exposure to global markets. Local consumers may also face limited access to superior goods and services. Additionally, ISI often requires significant government intervention and protectionist policies, which can deter foreign investment. Export-Led Growth (ELG), in contrast, emphasizes the production of goods for international markets, leveraging comparative advantages such as resource access and lower labor costs. This strategy has been highly successful for many countries in Eastern Asia, driving rapid economic growth, technology transfer, and integration into the global economy. However, ELG exposes developing countries to global market fluctuations and can lead to an overreliance on external demand. It may also result in unequal development, with the benefits concentrated in specific industries or regions. The role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is pivotal in shaping these strategies. The WTO promotes free trade and opposes protectionist policies, which directly impacts the feasibility of ISI. Countries pursuing ISI may face challenges under WTO rules, as protectionist measures like tariffs, non-tariff barriers, and subsidies could lead to trade disputes. Conversely, ELG aligns more closely with the WTO’s principles, encouraging countries to open their markets and participate in global trade. However, the WTO’s framework can be restrictive, limiting the policy space for countries to protect nascent industries or pursue mixed strategies that combine ISI with ELG. A hybrid strategy that combines ISI and ELG offers a balanced approach, allowing countries to develop domestic industries while accessing global markets. One possible hybrid option is to support and integrate local firms into global value chains. Multinational corporations often dictate quality and technical specifications, contributing to local skills development. However, these corporations also act as gatekeepers to overseas markets and control production strategies, potentially locking local firms into value chains with limited opportunities for broader upgrading. Balancing ISI and ELG requires a long-term perspective and careful coordination among business, labor and government stakeholders to ensure sustainable and inclusive growth.”

“It is widely recognized that international trade makes the world better off. And there are two main strategies that national economies are guided by when engaging in international trade. An export-led growth strategy involves opening a country to international trade, while an import substitution strategy focuses on restricting imports to protect domestic industries. The policy of protectionism can be justified in the case of emerging industries, helping them to become competitive enough to then succeed in the global market. However, protectionism (which includes the introduction of tariffs, currency control, tax incentives, low-interest financing, or government subsidies) can lead to unfair competition within the domestic market. This may result in monopolization, lower-quality products, and higher prices, which all discourage domestic production. The export-led approach relies on open access to international markets, which is crucial for countries with limited domestic market capacity, as the global market offers boundless opportunities. Besides, open trade fosters competition with international producers, driving up quality and driving down prices. The success of this strategy can be seen with the examples of East Asian Tigers that adopted it in the 1970s-1980s, and of Germany and Japan that transitioned to it in the 1950s-1960s. Numerous authors generally favor export-led policies over import substitution, considering the latter often to be less effective. Import substitution involves the direct regulation of international trade, while export-led growth relies on more indirect interventions. It is important to note that direct (administrative) interventions tend to cause price distortions. However, for developing economies, it can be beneficial to begin with import substitution by supporting the most promising industries in the short-term. Once these industries are ready to compete on the international markets, a shift toward an export-led strategy should be made.”

“Developing countries face a critical decision when choosing between import substitution industrialization and export-led growth, or a combination of both. ISI aims to reduce reliance on imports by fostering domestic industries, as seen in Brazil and India. This strategy can stimulate industrial growth and job creation. However, it may also result in inefficiencies, limited competition, and stifled innovation due to excessive protectionism. Conversely, export-led growth emphasizes integrating into the global market through competitive exports. Countries like South Korea and China have achieved rapid development with this approach. It provides access to larger markets, boosts foreign reserves, and promotes technological advancement. Yet, it can also make countries vulnerable to global economic fluctuations and potentially neglect domestic needs and income equality. A hybrid approach, which combines ISI and export-led growth, might offer a balanced solution. This protects emerging industries while engaging in competitive exports. According to the World Bank, this combined strategy can mitigate external vulnerabilities and support sustainable development by leveraging the strengths of both approaches. Ultimately, the choice between ISI, export-led growth, or a hybrid approach should align with a country’s economic context and long-term goals.”

“Developing countries face a strategic choice between import substitution industrialization (ISI) and export-led growth (ELG) to foster economic development. Both approaches have their distinct advantages and disadvantages, often leading to a debate on which strategy to adopt or whether a hybrid approach could be more effective.

Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)

Pros:

• Economic independence: ISI aims to reduce dependency on foreign goods by developing domestic industries, promoting self-sufficiency.
• Job creation: By supporting local industries, ISI can foster employment opportunities, reducing unemployment rates.
• Infant industry protection: Protecting nascent industries from international competition allows them to grow and become competitive over time.

Cons:

• Inefficiency and lack of competition: Without the pressure of international competition, domestic industries may become complacent, leading to inefficiencies.
• Limited market size: Domestic markets in developing countries may be too small to achieve economies of scale, limiting growth potential.
• Higher costs: Establishing and maintaining domestic industries can be expensive, requiring significant government investment and subsidies.

Export-Led Growth (ELG)

Pros:

• Access to larger markets: ELG enables countries to tap into global markets, potentially leading to higher sales and economic growth.
• Foreign exchange earnings: Exporting goods generates foreign currency, which can be used to purchase necessary imports and stabilize the economy.
• Efficiency and competitiveness: Exposure to global competition forces domestic industries to innovate and improve efficiency.

Cons:

• Vulnerability to external shocks: Relying heavily on exports makes economies susceptible to global market fluctuations and economic downturns in trade partner countries.
• Overdependence on specific industries: Focusing on a few export-oriented industries can lead to economic imbalances and the neglect of other sectors.
• Social and environmental costs: The push for competitiveness can lead to labor exploitation and environmental degradation if not managed properly.

Combining ISI and ELG. A hybrid approach can potentially leverage the strengths of both strategies. Initially, countries can adopt ISI to build a robust industrial base, then gradually shift towards ELG to access international markets. This dual strategy allows for the initial protection and growth of domestic industries, followed by exposure to global competition to enhance efficiency and innovation. However, balancing both strategies requires careful planning and policy implementation to avoid the pitfalls of each approach.

In conclusion, a combination of ISI and ELG can provide a balanced pathway for developing countries, fostering sustainable economic growth while minimizing the risks and leveraging the benefits of both strategies.”

“Historical records suggest that export-led growth has been the most viable model of industrialization and economic development in the past. Manufacturing-focused growth has benefitted from vast export markets relative to domestic markets, especially in the case of smaller countries. Furthermore, trade openness creates incentives for domestic firms to seek global expansion and exposes those firms to stiff global competition, prompting them to undertake continuous innovations and push for efficiency improvements. However, recent technological changes including robotization have made the model of export-led industrialization and growth in the contemporary world a less obvious choice for many developing countries than was the case some time ago. It seems that a growth strategy focusing solely on industrialization might not be enough. Increasingly, the expansion of manufacturing takes a more skills-intensive form, effectively meaning that only a “sophisticated” part of a labor force is likely to participate in manufacturing-based growth. Likewise, only high-skilled labor seems to benefit from the development of the advanced services sector. Hence, it seems a need has arisen for a more broad-based growth strategy that would also address the challenges facing less sophisticated, lower-productivity (growth) services in which a substantial part of the working population in a typical developing economy participates.”

See also: The consequences of Trump’s tariffs on the U.S. and the economies of its trade partners | Experts’ Opinions

As suggested by experts in the article above, finding the correct moment to switch from import-substituted to export-led economies can be vital to achieve the best economic output. International development experts face a similar dilemma when it comes to finding a new contract in the shortest period of time. Looking for new job opportunities across different sources is challenging and consumes valuable time. What if all the information needed in relation to job openings, tenders, and grants for individuals, donors, and organizations‘ contact information, and salary trends could be found in one single place? The DevelopmentAid platform is a one-stop shop for international experts. With an Individual Professional Membership, members will find all of the above within just a few clicks.